← All models

The Best Claude Model in October 2026, for Coding and Everything Else

Anthropic's 5.5 generation replaced the lineup in September and October 2026. Sonnet 5.5 is the best default for coding and everyday work, Opus 5.5 wins the hardest problems, and Haiku 5.5 covers fast, cheap volume. Fable 5.1 is the premium tier, but Opus 5.5 now outscores it on the public boards for less.

Choosing what to run inside the Claude Code agent, including cheaper non-Claude models? See the best model for Claude Code.

Updated 2026-10-14 · scores calibrated against Artificial Analysis, Terminal-Bench 4.0 and LMArena
Best for most people
Claude Sonnet 5.5
#2 on Artificial Analysis and Terminal-Bench 4.0, at half the price of Opus 5.5.
Full profile →
Best for the hardest tasks
Claude Opus 5.5
#1 on Artificial Analysis (58) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (64.9%): long tool chains, big refactors.
Full profile →
Best on a budget / for volume
Claude Haiku 5.5
Fast and cheap for triage, summaries, routing and subagents, as long as prompts stay under 100K tokens.
Full profile →

Claude models compared

ModelQualityAgenticSpeedContextBest for
Sonnet 5.59.89.78.41MThe everyday default for coding agents, escalating to Opus 5.5 for the hardest tasks
Opus 5.510.010.07.61MThe hardest coding and agent steps, with Sonnet 5.5 handling routine work
Haiku 5.58.27.69.51MSubagents, routing and high-volume steps that stay under 100K tokens per request
Fable 5.19.49.47.01MTeams already standardized on Fable that want the newest premium Claude

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Profile & live votes →

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the mid-tier Claude, released September 28, 2026 as a faster, lower-cost complement to Opus 5.5. It scores close to the flagship: 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index against Opus 5.5's 58, and 63.6% in Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 run, the highest of the models on this hub. On the tbench.ai leaderboard it is #2 at 61.8%, and it is #3 on LMArena's WebDev board. Anthropic reports 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 10.3% for Sonnet 5, and says it runs over 30% faster and costs up to 30% less than its predecessor. It has a 1M-token context window and 128K output; effort defaults to high on the API and medium in Claude Code.

Strengths
+ #2 on the tbench.ai Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard (61.8%), behind Opus 5.5
+ Half the per-token price of Opus 5.5 ($2/$10 vs $4/$20)
+ About 136 output tokens/s at max effort, per Artificial Analysis
Trade-offs
− Artificial Analysis flags it as very verbose, which adds output tokens
− A cache miss bills input at $2 per million, 20 times the cache-read rate
− Released September 2026, so its long-run track record is still short

Claude Opus 5.5

Profile & live votes →

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's current flagship, released September 22, 2026. Anthropic says it performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work while costing 40% less to run than Opus 5, and its docs recommend it as the default starting model. It scores 58 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (max effort), the highest of the models on this hub. On Terminal-Bench 4.0 it leads the tbench.ai leaderboard at 64.9% in Claude Code; in Artificial Analysis's own Terminal-Bench 4.0 run it scores 59.6%, behind Sonnet 5.5 at 63.6%. It has a 1M-token context window, 128K output, and always-on adaptive thinking with medium effort by default.

Strengths
+ #1 on the tbench.ai Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard (64.9% in Claude Code)
+ Highest Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score on this hub (58)
+ 1M-token context at the standard rate, with 128K output
Trade-offs
− Costs twice Sonnet 5.5 per request ($0.107 vs $0.053) for a small measured gain
− Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 run (63.6% vs 59.6%)
− Released September 2026, so its long-run track record is still short

Claude Haiku 5.5

Profile & live votes →

Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's fast, low-cost model, released October 7, 2026 and pitched for classification, extraction, routing and coding subagents under Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5. It is the first Haiku with adjustable effort and a 1M-token context window. Artificial Analysis scores it 43 on its Intelligence Index (max effort), against 17 for Haiku 4.5, at about 238 output tokens per second, and 32.8% in its Terminal-Bench 4.0 run; Anthropic reports 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, where Haiku 4.5 scored 0%. Pricing has two bands: prompts over 100K tokens are billed at five times the base rate on every token, and 49.7% of the coding-agent requests we measured were that large.

Strengths
+ 1M-token context and adjustable effort, both new for Haiku
+ Scores 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, against 17 for Haiku 4.5
+ About 238 output tokens/s, per Artificial Analysis
Trade-offs
− Prompts over 100K tokens cost 5x on the whole request, and 49.7% of the coding-agent requests we measured were that large
− New tokenizer counts about 30% more tokens than Haiku 4.5 for the same text

Claude Fable 5.1

Profile & live votes →

Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's premium model, released September 1, 2026 alongside the limited-access Mythos 5.1. Anthropic says it is about 25% cheaper than Fable 5 on typical work and up to 45% cheaper on agentic work, thanks to a lower cache-read price. It scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and 52.0% in Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 run (57.9% on the tbench.ai leaderboard), and ranks #2 on Scale's SWE-Bench Pro V2. Three weeks after launch, Anthropic said Opus 5.5 performs at Fable 5.1's level on most work; Opus 5.5 scores higher on both boards and costs less than half as much per request ($0.107 vs $0.24).

Strengths
+ #2 on Scale's SWE-Bench Pro V2 (99.1, Claude Code harness)
+ Cache reads at $0.25 per million, a quarter of Fable 5's
+ 1M-token context with 128K output
Trade-offs
− Opus 5.5 scores higher on Artificial Analysis and Terminal-Bench 4.0 at less than half the cost per request
− About 71 output tokens/s at max effort, per Artificial Analysis

Best Claude model: common questions

What is the best Claude model in October 2026?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best Claude model for most people: it scores 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, second only to Claude Opus 5.5 (58), at half Opus's price ($2/$10 versus $4/$20 per million tokens). Opus 5.5 is the best choice for the hardest coding and reasoning tasks, and Claude Haiku 5.5 is the pick for cheap, fast, high-volume work.

What is the best Claude model for coding?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard at 64.9%, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 second at 61.8%. For everyday coding Sonnet 5.5 is the better trade: nearly the same result at half the price per token. Use Opus 5.5 for large refactors, tricky debugging and long agentic runs.

Claude Opus vs Sonnet: which should I use?

Use Sonnet 5.5 as the default and escalate to Opus 5.5 when a task is genuinely hard. The gap between them is small on public benchmarks (58 vs 56 on Artificial Analysis), while Opus costs twice as much per token.

Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Opus 5.5?

Not on the public boards. Fable 5.1 scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and 57.9% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, below Opus 5.5's 58 and 64.9%, and it costs $10/$50 per million tokens versus $4/$20. Anthropic itself says Opus 5.5 performs at the level of Fable 5.1 on most work.

What is the cheapest Claude model?

Claude Haiku 5.5, at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100,000 tokens. Above that line every token in the request costs five times as much ($0.50/$2.50), so keep subagent prompts short. It is far stronger than Haiku 4.5 (43 vs 17 on Artificial Analysis).

Are Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6 and Haiku 4.5 still available?

Yes, Anthropic lists them as active legacy models on the API. Their 5.5 successors are cheaper per token (Opus 5.5 $4/$20 vs Opus 4.8 $5/$25; Sonnet 5.5 $2/$10 vs Sonnet 4.6 $3/$15) and score much higher on current benchmarks.

See the full model leaderboard →Best model for Claude Code →

The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →

Every model on this page runs on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe3,400+ agent users