Anthropic's 5.5 generation replaced the lineup in September and October 2026. Sonnet 5.5 is the best default for coding and everyday work, Opus 5.5 wins the hardest problems, and Haiku 5.5 covers fast, cheap volume. Fable 5.1 is the premium tier, but Opus 5.5 now outscores it on the public boards for less.
Choosing what to run inside the Claude Code agent, including cheaper non-Claude models? See the best model for Claude Code.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the mid-tier Claude, released September 28, 2026 as a faster, lower-cost complement to Opus 5.5. It scores close to the flagship: 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index against Opus 5.5's 58, and 63.6% in Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 run, the highest of the models on this hub. On the tbench.ai leaderboard it is #2 at 61.8%, and it is #3 on LMArena's WebDev board. Anthropic reports 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 10.3% for Sonnet 5, and says it runs over 30% faster and costs up to 30% less than its predecessor. It has a 1M-token context window and 128K output; effort defaults to high on the API and medium in Claude Code.
Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's current flagship, released September 22, 2026. Anthropic says it performs at the level of Claude Fable 5.1 on most work while costing 40% less to run than Opus 5, and its docs recommend it as the default starting model. It scores 58 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (max effort), the highest of the models on this hub. On Terminal-Bench 4.0 it leads the tbench.ai leaderboard at 64.9% in Claude Code; in Artificial Analysis's own Terminal-Bench 4.0 run it scores 59.6%, behind Sonnet 5.5 at 63.6%. It has a 1M-token context window, 128K output, and always-on adaptive thinking with medium effort by default.
Claude Haiku 5.5 is Anthropic's fast, low-cost model, released October 7, 2026 and pitched for classification, extraction, routing and coding subagents under Opus 5.5 or Sonnet 5.5. It is the first Haiku with adjustable effort and a 1M-token context window. Artificial Analysis scores it 43 on its Intelligence Index (max effort), against 17 for Haiku 4.5, at about 238 output tokens per second, and 32.8% in its Terminal-Bench 4.0 run; Anthropic reports 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, where Haiku 4.5 scored 0%. Pricing has two bands: prompts over 100K tokens are billed at five times the base rate on every token, and 49.7% of the coding-agent requests we measured were that large.
Claude Fable 5.1 is Anthropic's premium model, released September 1, 2026 alongside the limited-access Mythos 5.1. Anthropic says it is about 25% cheaper than Fable 5 on typical work and up to 45% cheaper on agentic work, thanks to a lower cache-read price. It scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and 52.0% in Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 run (57.9% on the tbench.ai leaderboard), and ranks #2 on Scale's SWE-Bench Pro V2. Three weeks after launch, Anthropic said Opus 5.5 performs at Fable 5.1's level on most work; Opus 5.5 scores higher on both boards and costs less than half as much per request ($0.107 vs $0.24).
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best Claude model for most people: it scores 56 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, second only to Claude Opus 5.5 (58), at half Opus's price ($2/$10 versus $4/$20 per million tokens). Opus 5.5 is the best choice for the hardest coding and reasoning tasks, and Claude Haiku 5.5 is the pick for cheap, fast, high-volume work.
Claude Opus 5.5 leads the Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard at 64.9%, with Claude Sonnet 5.5 second at 61.8%. For everyday coding Sonnet 5.5 is the better trade: nearly the same result at half the price per token. Use Opus 5.5 for large refactors, tricky debugging and long agentic runs.
Use Sonnet 5.5 as the default and escalate to Opus 5.5 when a task is genuinely hard. The gap between them is small on public benchmarks (58 vs 56 on Artificial Analysis), while Opus costs twice as much per token.
Not on the public boards. Fable 5.1 scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index and 57.9% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, below Opus 5.5's 58 and 64.9%, and it costs $10/$50 per million tokens versus $4/$20. Anthropic itself says Opus 5.5 performs at the level of Fable 5.1 on most work.
Claude Haiku 5.5, at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100,000 tokens. Above that line every token in the request costs five times as much ($0.50/$2.50), so keep subagent prompts short. It is far stronger than Haiku 4.5 (43 vs 17 on Artificial Analysis).
Yes, Anthropic lists them as active legacy models on the API. Their 5.5 successors are cheaper per token (Opus 5.5 $4/$20 vs Opus 4.8 $5/$25; Sonnet 5.5 $2/$10 vs Sonnet 4.6 $3/$15) and score much higher on current benchmarks.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Every model on this page runs on Standard Compute