Looking for an alternative to Requesty?

An LLM routing gateway that unifies many providers behind one API with analytics, caching, and failover.

Pricing: Pay-per-token at provider rates plus a platform fee.

TL;DR

Requesty solves multi-provider complexity; Standard Compute removes it. If your problem is 'too many providers to manage', a gateway helps. If your problem is 'the bill', flat-rate unlimited compute makes the meter — and the dashboard watching it — unnecessary.

Where Requesty shines

•Smart routing, failover, and spend analytics in one gateway
•Wide model coverage through one API
•Useful observability for teams running multiple providers

Why people look for an alternative

•Still per-token underneath — the gateway doesn't change the bill's shape
•Platform fee on top of provider prices
•Another layer to configure and monitor

Standard Compute vs Requesty

Standard Compute is an OpenAI-compatible API with unlimited frontier-model compute at a flat monthly price (from $9/mo) — no per-token billing, no 429 rate limits. Under sustained heavy load it batches gracefully instead of erroring or charging more.

Pick Standard Compute when…

•You don't want to manage routing at all — one endpoint, flat price
•Cost predictability instead of analytics about unpredictable costs
•Heavy agent workloads where per-token pricing is the core problem

Stick with Requesty when…

•Teams that genuinely need multi-provider routing and per-request analytics
•Compliance setups requiring specific upstream providers

Switching takes one config change

Standard Compute is OpenAI-compatible, so any tool or SDK that lets you set a custom base URL migrates in minutes:

Base URL  = https://api.stdcmpt.com/v1
API key   = your Standard Compute key
Model     = standardcompute

Setup guides for every major agent — OpenClaw, Hermes, OpenCode, Cursor, Cline, Aider and more — on the integrations page. Free tier to test it, no card required.

FAQ

Can I use Standard Compute behind a gateway like Requesty or LiteLLM?

Yes — it's OpenAI-compatible, so gateways treat it like any custom provider. Many users route through LiteLLM with Standard Compute as the workhorse model and per-token providers as fallbacks.