Amp
Amp
VS
Roo Code
Roo Code

Amp vs Roo Code — Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Amp and Roo Code across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results — doesn't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Amp
Roo Code
Category
Coding Agent
Coding Agent
Pricing
Usage-based credits / free tier
Free (BYO API key)
Open Source
No
Yes
Best For
Teams that want maximum-capability agentic coding and will pay for tokens at cost
Power users who want a deeply configurable VS Code agent and don't mind tuning it
Key Features
Always-frontier models, no picker, Shareable threads & team visibility, Subagents for parallel work
Switchable modes (Architect / Code / Debug / custom), Auto-approval for hands-off runs, MCP server support

Verdict: Amp or Roo Code?

Updated 2026-07-04

Choose Amp if you are teams that want maximum-capability agentic coding and will pay for tokens at cost. Choose Roo Code if you are power users who want a deeply configurable VS Code agent and don't mind tuning it.

In our editorial scoring, Amp leads in 4 of six categories (output quality, reliability, speed and ease of use), while Roo Code leads in 1 (value). On price, Amp runs usage-based credits / free tier and is proprietary; Roo Code runs free (byo api key) and is open source.

In-Depth Comparison

Amp Overview

Amp is Sourcegraph's take on agentic coding: no model picker, no knobs — it always runs frontier models with maximum reasoning and leans into autonomy. Work happens in shareable threads across the VS Code extension and CLI, with subagents for parallelizable work and team visibility into how colleagues prompt. It's deliberately opinionated and token-hungry; credits are consumed at cost, so sustained heavy use gets expensive, and there's no BYO-key escape hatch.

Roo Code Overview

Roo Code began as a fork of Cline and grew into its own power-user favourite. Its signature feature is modes: switchable personas like Architect (plan), Code (build), and Debug (fix), plus fully custom modes with their own prompts and tool permissions. It supports auto-approval settings for hands-off runs, MCP servers, and any OpenAI-compatible provider. The trade-off for all that configurability is a steeper setup than Cline — and, like every BYO-key agent, your API bill scales with how hard you run it.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
8.5
vs
8.0
Autonomy
8.5
vs
8.5
Reliability
8.0
vs
7.5
Speed
8.0
vs
7.5
Value
7.0
vs
8.5
Ease of Use
8.0
vs
7.5

Features

Amp
  • Always-frontier models, no picker
  • Shareable threads & team visibility
  • Subagents for parallel work
  • VS Code extension + CLI
  • Deep codebase context (Sourcegraph DNA)
  • Opinionated, zero-config design
Roo Code
  • Switchable modes (Architect / Code / Debug / custom)
  • Auto-approval for hands-off runs
  • MCP server support
  • Any OpenAI-compatible provider (BYO key)
  • Fine-grained tool permissions
  • Open source (Apache 2.0)

Whichever you pick — run it on unlimited compute

Both work with any OpenAI-compatible provider. Point the base URL at Standard Compute and get unlimited frontier-model compute from $9/mo flat — no per-token billing, no 429 rate limits.

Roo Code setup guide →

Power any agent with unlimited tokens

Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.

Get My API Key
No credit card required · Free tier included

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSRoo CodeAmpVSClaude CodeHermesVSRoo CodeAmpVSHermesCodexVSRoo CodeAmpVSCodexGemini CLIVSRoo CodeAmpVSGemini CLI