An in-depth comparison of Amp and Roo Code across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.
Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.
Choose Amp if you are teams that want maximum-capability agentic coding and will pay for tokens at cost. Choose Roo Code if you are power users who want a deeply configurable VS Code agent and don't mind tuning it.
In our editorial scoring, Amp leads in 4 of six categories (output quality, reliability, speed and ease of use), while Roo Code leads in 1 (value). On price, Amp runs usage-based credits / free tier and is proprietary; Roo Code runs free (byo api key) and is open source.
Amp is Sourcegraph's take on agentic coding: no model picker, no knobs — it always runs frontier models with maximum reasoning and leans into autonomy. Work happens in shareable threads across the VS Code extension and CLI, with subagents for parallelizable work and team visibility into how colleagues prompt. It's deliberately opinionated and token-hungry; credits are consumed at cost, so sustained heavy use gets expensive, and there's no BYO-key escape hatch.
Roo Code began as a fork of Cline and grew into its own power-user favourite. Its signature feature is modes: switchable personas like Architect (plan), Code (build), and Debug (fix), plus fully custom modes with their own prompts and tool permissions. It supports auto-approval settings for hands-off runs, MCP servers, and any OpenAI-compatible provider. The trade-off for all that configurability is a steeper setup than Cline — and, like every BYO-key agent, your API bill scales with how hard you run it.
Both work with any OpenAI-compatible provider. Point the base URL at Standard Compute and get unlimited frontier-model compute from $9/mo flat — no per-token billing, no 429 rate limits.
Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.