Log in
Claude Code
Claude Code
VS
Devin
Devin

Claude Code vs Devin — Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Claude Code and Devin across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results — doesn't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Claude Code
Devin
Category
Coding Agent
Coding Agent
Pricing
Included with Claude Pro/Max / API
$20/mo entry + usage (ACUs)
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Developers who want the strongest end-to-end coding agent, in the terminal or IDE
Teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end
Key Features
Agentic codebase search & planning, Multi-file editing & refactoring, Test running & verification
Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow, Own cloud dev environment + browser, Parallel sessions

Verdict: Claude Code or Devin?

Updated 2026-07-04

Choose Claude Code if you are developers who want the strongest end-to-end coding agent, in the terminal or IDE. Choose Devin if you are teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end.

In our editorial scoring, Claude Code leads in 4 of six categories (output quality, reliability, speed and value), while Devin leads in 1 (autonomy). On price, Claude Code runs included with claude pro/max / api and is proprietary; Devin runs $20/mo entry + usage (acus) and is proprietary.

Where Claude Code falls short
  • Proprietary — requires a Claude subscription or pay-per-token API billing
  • Heavy daily use pushes you toward the more expensive Max plans
Full Claude Code review →

In-Depth Comparison

Claude Code Overview

Claude Code is Anthropic's agentic coding tool. It searches and understands your codebase, plans multi-step changes, edits files, runs tests and shell commands, and works through git workflows including commits and pull requests. Widely regarded as the quality benchmark among terminal coding agents, it's extensible through MCP servers, hooks, and subagents, and also ships as IDE extensions and a desktop app.

Devin Overview

Devin is Cognition's fully autonomous software engineer: give it a task in Slack, Linear, or the web IDE and it plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens a pull request in its own cloud sandbox — including several sessions in parallel. It shines on well-scoped, repetitive engineering work (migrations, test coverage, small features) and improved markedly through its 2.x releases, but it remains weaker on ambiguous, novel tasks, and ACU-based usage pricing means heavy use costs real money. Cognition also acquired Windsurf in 2025, folding its IDE technology into the same product family.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
9.5
vs
8.5
Autonomy
9.0
vs
9.5
Reliability
9.0
vs
7.0
Speed
8.0
vs
7.0
Value
8.0
vs
6.0
Ease of Use
8.5
vs
8.5

Features

Claude Code
  • Agentic codebase search & planning
  • Multi-file editing & refactoring
  • Test running & verification
  • Git workflows incl. PRs
  • MCP server integrations
  • Hooks, subagents & automation
Devin
  • Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow
  • Own cloud dev environment + browser
  • Parallel sessions
  • Slack / Linear / GitHub integration
  • Machine snapshots & playbooks
  • Interactive planning mode

Power any agent with unlimited tokens

Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.

Get My API Key
No credit card required · Free tier included

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSHermesClaude CodeVSCodexClaude CodeVSGemini CLIClaude CodeVSOpenClawClaude CodeVSKilo CodeClaude CodeVSCursorClaude CodeVSCopilotClaude CodeVSCline