An in-depth comparison of OpenAI Codex CLI and Cursor across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.
Comparing the subscriptions instead?ChatGPT Plus / Pro vs Cursor Pro / Ultra →
Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime. 1 votes cast so far.
Choose OpenAI Codex CLI if you are chatGPT subscribers who want a capable terminal agent at no extra cost. Choose Cursor if you are developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience.
In our editorial scoring, Cursor leads in 3 of six categories (reliability, speed and ease of use), while OpenAI Codex CLI leads in 1 (value). On price, OpenAI Codex CLI runs included with chatgpt plans / api and is open source; Cursor runs free tier / $20–200/mo and is proprietary.
Across 1 community votes on this matchup, OpenAI Codex CLI currently leads in 1 of six categories. Cast your own vote above to move the needle.
Give your chosen agent more room to build, test and iterate. Standard Compute stretches your compute through automatic provider selection and smart routing. Plans start at $19/month with $20 in monthly compute. Choose your agent below to connect. Eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute with no card.
See the trial and activation steps →
Weighing the cost of running it? Compare API plans for Codex
Codex CLI is OpenAI's open-source coding agent for the terminal. It edits files, runs commands in a sandbox with configurable approval modes, and can hand longer tasks off to Codex cloud to run in the background. Usage is included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro plans, making it the default choice for developers already in the OpenAI ecosystem.
Cursor is a fork of VS Code redesigned from the ground up for AI-powered development. It features tab completions, natural language code editing, codebase-wide chat, and multi-file editing. Its deep editor integration makes it one of the most polished AI coding tools available.
Codex and Cursor both run on Standard Compute