An in-depth comparison of Continue and Jules across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.
Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.
Choose Continue if you are developers who want full control over their AI coding assistant. Choose Jules if you are developers who want to queue up fixes and features and review PRs later.
In our editorial scoring, Jules leads in 3 of six categories (output quality, autonomy and ease of use), while Continue leads in 2 (speed and value). On price, Continue runs free (byo api key) and is open source; Jules runs free tier / google ai plans and is proprietary.
Give your chosen agent more room to build, test and iterate. Standard Compute stretches your compute through automatic provider selection and smart routing. Plans start at $19/month with $20 in monthly compute. Choose your agent below to connect. Eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute with no card.
See the trial and activation steps →
Weighing the cost of running it? Compare API plans for Continue
Continue is an open-source AI coding assistant that works as an extension for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs. It offers chat, autocomplete, and inline editing with full control over which models you use. Highly customizable with support for local models, cloud APIs, and custom context providers.
Jules is Google's asynchronous coding agent, powered by Gemini. Unlike interactive agents, you assign it tasks — bug fixes, dependency bumps, small features — and it clones your repo into a cloud VM, writes and tests the change, and comes back with a pull request and an audio changelog summary. The free tier makes it an easy add to any workflow, but the async model means it suits queued, well-defined tasks rather than tight pair-programming loops, and turnaround depends on task queue and complexity.
Continue runs on Standard Compute