Continue
Continue
VS
OpenCode
OpenCode

Continue vs OpenCode: Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Continue and OpenCode across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

What a day with Continue or OpenCode costs

Either way, you pay for the model calls. A median coding-agent day on our gateway is 95 requests and 8.6 million tokens. The table prices every step at one model’s rate.

Both run on Standard Compute, where each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it: routine steps go to efficient open models, hard ones to frontier models such as Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra.

Providers
Vetted for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails
Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them
Median and 90th percentile active days of coding-agent traffic, Sep 14 to Oct 13, priced at list. Agent Burn Index
ModelTypical dayBusy day
Claude Opus 5.5$7.34$59.10
Claude Sonnet 5.5$3.67$29.55
GPT-6 Luna$0.23$2.43
Get your API key Continue setup →OpenCode setup →

Fixed monthly plans from $19. Eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute first, no card. Trial terms

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category. You can change your vote anytime. 24 votes cast so far.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Continue 63%8 votes38% OpenCode
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Continue 40%5 votes60% OpenCode
Reliability
Consistent results that don't go off the rails or break
Continue 33%3 votes67% OpenCode
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Continue 0%2 votes100% OpenCode
Value
What you get for what you pay
Continue 0%2 votes100% OpenCode
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Continue 25%4 votes75% OpenCode

The short version

Updated 2026-10-16

One fact decides most of this comparison now: Continue is no longer maintained. Its team joined Cursor and the continuedev/continue repo has been read-only since mid-2026, while OpenCode ships new releases most weeks. If you want Continue's in-editor style in a maintained tool, look at Cline or Kilo Code.

Continue and OpenCode are both open source and both bring-your-own-model, but they're different classes of tool. Continue is an AI assistant living inside VS Code and JetBrains: chat, autocomplete, and inline edits with unusually deep configuration: custom context providers, local models, slash commands. It assists while you drive; autonomy is deliberately limited.

OpenCode is an agent: give it a task in the terminal and it plans, edits files, and runs commands through to a result. That autonomy gap is the real difference: Continue polishes the keystroke-by-keystroke experience, OpenCode takes work off your hands in bigger units.

If you're choosing between them, you're really choosing your interaction model: continuous assistance in the editor, or delegated tasks in the terminal. Cost-wise both are free tools where you pay only for the model behind them.

Choose Continue if…
  • You want autocomplete and chat woven into your editor, not delegation
  • Deep customization (context providers, local models) is a feature, not a chore
  • You prefer staying hands-on-keyboard for every change
Choose OpenCode if…
  • You want to hand the agent a task and review the result
  • Terminal-first workflows fit you better than editor panels
  • You want session management for long-running work
Continue
OpenCode
Category
IDE Extension
Coding Agent
Pricing
Free (BYO API key), no longer maintained
Free (MIT) / free Zen models / Go $10/mo
Open Source
Yes
Yes
Best For
Developers who want full control over their AI coding assistant
Terminal users who want a polished AI coding interface with LSP support
Key Features
VS Code & JetBrains support, Customizable models, Chat & autocomplete
Beautiful terminal TUI, Multi-provider support, LSP integration

Verdict: Continue or OpenCode?

Updated 2026-10-16

Choose Continue if you are developers who want full control over their AI coding assistant. Choose OpenCode if you are terminal users who want a polished AI coding interface with LSP support.

In our editorial scoring, OpenCode leads in 4 of six categories (output quality, autonomy, reliability and speed), while Continue leads in 1 (value). On price, Continue runs free (byo api key), no longer maintained and is open source; OpenCode runs free (mit) / free zen models / go $10/mo and is open source.

Across 24 community votes on this matchup, OpenCode currently leads in 5 of six categories. Cast your own vote above to move the needle.

Where Continue falls short
  • No longer maintained: the team joined Cursor and the repo has been read-only since mid-2026, so no fixes for new models or editors
  • Configuration-heavy: the power comes with real setup time
Full Continue review →
Where OpenCode falls short
  • Provider and extension compatibility should be checked for your chosen workflow
  • The free Zen models rotate and some are limited-time, so a $0 setup can change under you
Full OpenCode review →

What it costs to run Continue or OpenCode

Best API for Continue →
4 options compared, with prices and limits

Best API for OpenCode →
7 options compared, with prices and limits

Found your agent? Cut what it spends on models.

Standard Compute sends each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans start at $19 a month, and eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute with no card. Choose your agent below to connect.

Continue setup guide →OpenCode setup guide →

See the trial and activation steps →

More on OpenCode: OpenCode Pricing: Plans, Subscription and API Costs (2026) · How do I use GPT models like GPT-5.6 in OpenCode?

In-Depth Comparison

Continue Overview

Continue is an open-source (Apache 2.0) AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, plus a CLI. It offers chat, autocomplete, and inline editing with full control over which models you use, including local models, cloud APIs, and custom context providers. It is no longer developed: the Continue team joined Cursor, the GitHub repo is read-only, and the last release (2.1.0 for VS Code) shipped in June 2026. The extension still installs and works, but expect no fixes for new models or editor versions.

OpenCode Overview

OpenCode is an open-source (MIT) AI coding agent best known for its terminal TUI, now also shipping a desktop app and IDE extensions with OpenCode 2. It connects to 75+ LLM providers through models.dev, has LSP integration for real code understanding, and runs several sessions in parallel. The tool is free; for models you bring your own key, use OpenCode's free Zen models, pay as you go on Zen, or subscribe to its Go plan ($10/month, Go Plus $40).

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
7.5
vs
8.0
Autonomy
6.5
vs
7.5
Reliability
6.5
vs
7.5
Speed
7.5
vs
8.0
Value
9.5
vs
9.0
Ease of Use
8.0
vs
8.0

Features

Continue
  • VS Code & JetBrains support
  • Customizable models
  • Chat & autocomplete
  • Custom context providers
  • Local model support
  • Slash commands
OpenCode
  • Beautiful terminal TUI
  • Multi-provider support
  • LSP integration
  • Session management
  • File editing & creation
  • Shell command execution

Continue and OpenCode both run on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime · Continue setup → · OpenCode setup →

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe3,600+ agent users

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSContinueClaude CodeVSOpenCodeContinueVSHermesHermesVSOpenCodeCodexVSContinueCodexVSOpenCodeContinueVSGemini CLIGemini CLIVSOpenCode