Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
How much capability you get per dollar
Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks
Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).
Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if you want the hardest coding and agent steps, with Sonnet 5.5 handling routine work. Choose Muse Spark Open if you want trying Meta's open-weight coding model through OpenRouter, or self-hosting it where code must stay on your own hardware.
In our editorial scoring, Claude Opus 5.5 leads in 5 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability, speed, value for money and reliability), while Muse Spark Open leads in 0. On price, Claude Opus 5.5 runs about $8.80 per 1M tokens (blended) and is proprietary; Muse Spark Open is about $2.15 and open-weight.
Setting it up? Claude Opus 5.5: model ID, providers and agent config
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute