Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best all-round model for Hermes Agent: it scores 61.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, a benchmark of long terminal tasks, and costs about $5.33 per 100 coding-agent requests on our measured traffic. Hermes needs at least 64K tokens of context for tool use and by default sends auxiliary tasks such as context compression to your main model, so that model's price applies to every call. Claude Opus 5.5 (64.9%) is the pick for runs that must finish unattended, and Claude Haiku 5.5 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash keep always-on loops cheap.
Sources: Hermes Agent provider docs · Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard · Anthropic on Haiku 5.5 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash release · Cost per request methodology
Run any of these models in your agent
Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.
Best overall. 61.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, second only to Opus 5.5, at half its price. Hermes talks to Anthropic's Messages API natively, and Sonnet 5.5 has a 1M-token context with no long-prompt surcharge.
Best for long agent runs. #1 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 64.9%. Worth the doubled rates when Hermes works through a long task with nobody watching and a failed run costs more than the tokens.
Best value. Anthropic reports 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens. A good auxiliary model for compression and summaries; prompts over 100K tokens cost five times as much.
Budget pick. Open weights under the MIT license at $0.30/$1.20 per million tokens at peak hours and half that off-peak. DeepSeek reports 42.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for its October 17 update, up from 31.2%, so keep it to routine steps.
Open-weight pick. The highest-scoring open-weight model on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (41.8%), with a 1M-token context, for setups that self-host or want open weights.
OpenAI pick. 58.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at the same $2/$10 list price as Sonnet 5.5. Requests over 272K input tokens bill at $4/$15.
A typical request sends 99,534 input tokens, 87% of them read from cache, and a median session runs 16 requests. Measured on pooled coding-agent requests through our gateway (79,301 requests from 75 users; Hermes alone has fewer than 50 users, so its traffic is pooled), Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026, priced at each vendor's list rates.
| Model | 100 requests | Median session | Month of regular use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $5.33 | $0.74 | $77.42 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $10.66 | $1.47 | $155 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | $1.31 | $0.096 | $17.73 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.67 | $0.091 | $9.13 |
| GLM 5.3 | $5.72 | $0.71 | $92.16 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | $6.74 | $0.74 | $90.04 |
Month of regular use = the median user active on 5 or more days (1,478 requests in 30 days). Methodology · All models ranked by cost per request
The highest-rated model whose list-price cost for a month of regular use (1,478 requests) stays under each budget. Heavier months cost proportionally more.
| Monthly budget | Best model that fits | Est. month |
|---|---|---|
| Under $19 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $17.73 |
| Under $49 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $17.73 |
| Under $99 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $77.42 |
"Highest-rated" uses our editorial quality and agentic scores; candidates are current models with a checked vendor price.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Every model on this page runs on Standard Compute