Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
How much capability you get per dollar
Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks
Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).
Choose GLM 4.6 if you want short-context coding tasks on a tight budget. Choose Muse Spark Open if you want trying Meta's open-weight coding model through OpenRouter, or self-hosting it where code must stay on your own hardware.
In our editorial scoring, Muse Spark Open leads in 3 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability and speed), while GLM 4.6 leads in 2. On price, GLM 4.6 runs about $0.95 per 1M tokens (blended) and is open-weight; Muse Spark Open is about $2.15 and open-weight.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute