Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
How much capability you get per dollar
Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks
Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).
Choose GPT-5.3-Codex if you want existing Codex setups on an API key that still pin GPT-5.3-Codex. Choose Muse Spark Open if you want trying Meta's open-weight coding model through OpenRouter, or self-hosting it where code must stay on your own hardware.
In our editorial scoring, GPT-5.3-Codex leads in 3 of five dimensions (agentic ability, speed and reliability), while Muse Spark Open leads in 2. On price, GPT-5.3-Codex runs about $5.42 per 1M tokens (blended) and is proprietary; Muse Spark Open is about $2.15 and open-weight.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute