GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Max: which is better for agents?

GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on output quality (8.6/10 vs 6.3/10), while Qwen3.7 Max is the cheaper option. GPT-5.6 Sol is best for existing GPT-5.6 Sol setups until they move to GPT-6.1 Sol; Qwen3.7 Max is best for fast, long-context general work in Qwen-based stacks. Live community votes on this page show what people actually prefer.

Is GPT-5.6 Sol cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper: roughly $2.36 vs $4.40 per 1M tokens (blended). GPT-5.6 Sol: $2.00 in · $10 out / 1M tokens. Qwen3.7 Max: $1.48 in · $4.42 out / 1M tokens.

Can I switch between GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3.7 Max in the same agent?

Yes. Model-agnostic agents (Cline, Aider, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Kilo Code, OpenCode) let you swap models per task. Many people route hard tasks to the stronger model and routine work to the cheaper one.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Max — Which AI Model Is Better? (2026)

Community vote

Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.

Output Quality

Correctness and depth of what it produces

Agentic Ability

Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks

Speed

Tokens per second and time-to-first-token

Value for Money

How much capability you get per dollar

Reliability

Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks

Specs and pricing side by side

Spec

GPT-5.6 Sol

Qwen3.7 Max

Maker

OpenAI

Alibaba (Qwen)

Blended price / 1M

$4.40

$2.36

Input / output

$2.00 in · $10 out / 1M tokens

$1.48 in · $4.42 out / 1M tokens

Context window

1.1M

Open weights

Tool use

Yes

Reasoning

Yes

Output Quality

8.6

6.3

Agentic Ability

7.9

4.9

Speed

7.6

9.2

Value for Money

4.6

4.7

Reliability

9.2

8.4

Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).

Verdict: GPT-5.6 Sol or Qwen3.7 Max?

Updated 2026-10-14

Choose GPT-5.6 Sol if you want existing GPT-5.6 Sol setups until they move to GPT-6.1 Sol. Choose Qwen3.7 Max if you want fast, long-context general work in Qwen-based stacks.

In our editorial scoring, GPT-5.6 Sol leads in 3 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability and reliability), while Qwen3.7 Max leads in 2. On price, GPT-5.6 Sol runs about $4.40 per 1M tokens (blended) and is proprietary; Qwen3.7 Max is about $2.36 and proprietary.

Where GPT-5.6 Sol falls short

Superseded by GPT-6.1 Sol, which scores higher at half the list price ($2/$10 vs $4/$20)
Prompts over 272K tokens bill at higher rates

Full GPT-5.6 Sol breakdown →

Where Qwen3.7 Max falls short

Weak on long agentic tasks (1.5% in Artificial Analysis's Terminal-Bench 4.0 run)
Costs more per request than Claude Sonnet 5.5 at OpenRouter's listed price

Full Qwen3.7 Max breakdown →

Every model on this page is included with Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra