Amp
Amp
VS
Devin
Devin

Amp vs Devin — Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Amp and Devin across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results — doesn't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Amp
Devin
Category
Coding Agent
Coding Agent
Pricing
Usage-based credits / free tier
$20/mo entry + usage (ACUs)
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Teams that want maximum-capability agentic coding and will pay for tokens at cost
Teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end
Key Features
Always-frontier models, no picker, Shareable threads & team visibility, Subagents for parallel work
Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow, Own cloud dev environment + browser, Parallel sessions

Verdict: Amp or Devin?

Updated 2026-07-04

Choose Amp if you are teams that want maximum-capability agentic coding and will pay for tokens at cost. Choose Devin if you are teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end.

In our editorial scoring, Amp leads in 3 of six categories (reliability, speed and value), while Devin leads in 2 (autonomy and ease of use). On price, Amp runs usage-based credits / free tier and is proprietary; Devin runs $20/mo entry + usage (acus) and is proprietary.

In-Depth Comparison

Amp Overview

Amp is Sourcegraph's take on agentic coding: no model picker, no knobs — it always runs frontier models with maximum reasoning and leans into autonomy. Work happens in shareable threads across the VS Code extension and CLI, with subagents for parallelizable work and team visibility into how colleagues prompt. It's deliberately opinionated and token-hungry; credits are consumed at cost, so sustained heavy use gets expensive, and there's no BYO-key escape hatch.

Devin Overview

Devin is Cognition's fully autonomous software engineer: give it a task in Slack, Linear, or the web IDE and it plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens a pull request in its own cloud sandbox — including several sessions in parallel. It shines on well-scoped, repetitive engineering work (migrations, test coverage, small features) and improved markedly through its 2.x releases, but it remains weaker on ambiguous, novel tasks, and ACU-based usage pricing means heavy use costs real money. Cognition also acquired Windsurf in 2025, folding its IDE technology into the same product family.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
8.5
vs
8.5
Autonomy
8.5
vs
9.5
Reliability
8.0
vs
7.0
Speed
8.0
vs
7.0
Value
7.0
vs
6.0
Ease of Use
8.0
vs
8.5

Features

Amp
  • Always-frontier models, no picker
  • Shareable threads & team visibility
  • Subagents for parallel work
  • VS Code extension + CLI
  • Deep codebase context (Sourcegraph DNA)
  • Opinionated, zero-config design
Devin
  • Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow
  • Own cloud dev environment + browser
  • Parallel sessions
  • Slack / Linear / GitHub integration
  • Machine snapshots & playbooks
  • Interactive planning mode

Power any agent with unlimited tokens

Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.

Get My API Key
No credit card required · Free tier included

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSDevinAmpVSClaude CodeDevinVSHermesAmpVSHermesCodexVSDevinAmpVSCodexDevinVSGemini CLIAmpVSGemini CLI