OpenAI Codex CLI
OpenAI Codex CLI
VS
Devin
Devin

OpenAI Codex CLI vs Devin — Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of OpenAI Codex CLI and Devin across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results — doesn't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Codex
Devin
Category
Coding Agent
Coding Agent
Pricing
Included with ChatGPT plans / API
$20/mo entry + usage (ACUs)
Open Source
Yes
No
Best For
ChatGPT subscribers who want a capable terminal agent at no extra cost
Teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end
Key Features
Sandboxed command execution, Configurable approval modes, Multi-file editing
Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow, Own cloud dev environment + browser, Parallel sessions

Verdict: Codex or Devin?

Updated 2026-07-04

Choose OpenAI Codex CLI if you are chatGPT subscribers who want a capable terminal agent at no extra cost. Choose Devin if you are teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end.

In our editorial scoring, OpenAI Codex CLI leads in 4 of six categories (output quality, reliability, speed and value), while Devin leads in 2 (autonomy and ease of use). On price, OpenAI Codex CLI runs included with chatgpt plans / api and is open source; Devin runs $20/mo entry + usage (acus) and is proprietary.

Where Codex falls short
  • Best models are tied to the OpenAI ecosystem
  • Younger as a CLI tool than Aider — fewer battle-tested workflows
Full Codex review →

In-Depth Comparison

OpenAI Codex CLI Overview

Codex CLI is OpenAI's open-source coding agent for the terminal. It edits files, runs commands in a sandbox with configurable approval modes, and can hand longer tasks off to Codex cloud to run in the background. Usage is included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro plans, making it the default choice for developers already in the OpenAI ecosystem.

Devin Overview

Devin is Cognition's fully autonomous software engineer: give it a task in Slack, Linear, or the web IDE and it plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens a pull request in its own cloud sandbox — including several sessions in parallel. It shines on well-scoped, repetitive engineering work (migrations, test coverage, small features) and improved markedly through its 2.x releases, but it remains weaker on ambiguous, novel tasks, and ACU-based usage pricing means heavy use costs real money. Cognition also acquired Windsurf in 2025, folding its IDE technology into the same product family.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
9.0
vs
8.5
Autonomy
8.5
vs
9.5
Reliability
8.0
vs
7.0
Speed
8.0
vs
7.0
Value
7.5
vs
6.0
Ease of Use
8.0
vs
8.5

Features

Codex
  • Sandboxed command execution
  • Configurable approval modes
  • Multi-file editing
  • Cloud task handoff
  • GitHub integration
  • Scriptable automation
Devin
  • Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow
  • Own cloud dev environment + browser
  • Parallel sessions
  • Slack / Linear / GitHub integration
  • Machine snapshots & playbooks
  • Interactive planning mode

Whichever you pick — run it on unlimited compute

Both work with any OpenAI-compatible provider. Point the base URL at Standard Compute and get unlimited frontier-model compute from $9/mo flat — no per-token billing, no 429 rate limits.

Codex setup guide →

Power any agent with unlimited tokens

Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.

Get My API Key
No credit card required · Free tier included

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSCodexClaude CodeVSDevinCodexVSHermesDevinVSHermesCodexVSGemini CLICodexVSOpenClawCodexVSKilo CodeCodexVSCursor