Devin
Devin
VS
Roo Code
Roo Code

Devin vs Roo Code — Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Devin and Roo Code across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results — doesn't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Devin
Roo Code
Category
Coding Agent
Coding Agent
Pricing
$20/mo entry + usage (ACUs)
Free (BYO API key)
Open Source
No
Yes
Best For
Teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end
Power users who want a deeply configurable VS Code agent and don't mind tuning it
Key Features
Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow, Own cloud dev environment + browser, Parallel sessions
Switchable modes (Architect / Code / Debug / custom), Auto-approval for hands-off runs, MCP server support

Verdict: Devin or Roo Code?

Updated 2026-07-04

Choose Devin if you are teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end. Choose Roo Code if you are power users who want a deeply configurable VS Code agent and don't mind tuning it.

Editorially this matchup is a dead heat: each agent leads in 3 of our six categories. On price, Devin runs $20/mo entry + usage (acus) and is proprietary; Roo Code runs free (byo api key) and is open source.

In-Depth Comparison

Devin Overview

Devin is Cognition's fully autonomous software engineer: give it a task in Slack, Linear, or the web IDE and it plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens a pull request in its own cloud sandbox — including several sessions in parallel. It shines on well-scoped, repetitive engineering work (migrations, test coverage, small features) and improved markedly through its 2.x releases, but it remains weaker on ambiguous, novel tasks, and ACU-based usage pricing means heavy use costs real money. Cognition also acquired Windsurf in 2025, folding its IDE technology into the same product family.

Roo Code Overview

Roo Code began as a fork of Cline and grew into its own power-user favourite. Its signature feature is modes: switchable personas like Architect (plan), Code (build), and Debug (fix), plus fully custom modes with their own prompts and tool permissions. It supports auto-approval settings for hands-off runs, MCP servers, and any OpenAI-compatible provider. The trade-off for all that configurability is a steeper setup than Cline — and, like every BYO-key agent, your API bill scales with how hard you run it.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
8.5
vs
8.0
Autonomy
9.5
vs
8.5
Reliability
7.0
vs
7.5
Speed
7.0
vs
7.5
Value
6.0
vs
8.5
Ease of Use
8.5
vs
7.5

Features

Devin
  • Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow
  • Own cloud dev environment + browser
  • Parallel sessions
  • Slack / Linear / GitHub integration
  • Machine snapshots & playbooks
  • Interactive planning mode
Roo Code
  • Switchable modes (Architect / Code / Debug / custom)
  • Auto-approval for hands-off runs
  • MCP server support
  • Any OpenAI-compatible provider (BYO key)
  • Fine-grained tool permissions
  • Open source (Apache 2.0)

Whichever you pick — run it on unlimited compute

Both work with any OpenAI-compatible provider. Point the base URL at Standard Compute and get unlimited frontier-model compute from $9/mo flat — no per-token billing, no 429 rate limits.

Roo Code setup guide →

Power any agent with unlimited tokens

Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.

Get My API Key
No credit card required · Free tier included

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSRoo CodeClaude CodeVSDevinHermesVSRoo CodeDevinVSHermesCodexVSRoo CodeCodexVSDevinGemini CLIVSRoo CodeDevinVSGemini CLI