For coding agents, Claude Fable 5 costs 36x as much as Codestral per request ($0.25 vs $0.0070 on our measured traffic), because Claude Fable 5 lists at $10 input, $1 cached input and $50 output per million tokens against $0.30, $0.03 and $0.90 for Codestral.
Run Claude Fable 5 and Claude Fable 5.1 in your agent
Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.
| Cost at list price | Codestral | Fable 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached | $0.0043 | $0.16 |
| Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached | $0.011 | $0.38 |
| Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached | n/a | n/a |
| Average request | $0.0070 | $0.25 |
| 100 requests | $0.70 | $25.04 |
| Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes | $0.084 | $3.04 |
| A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days | $8.91 | $317 |
Each logged request priced at the vendor’s list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. Both models are priced on the requests up to 256K tokens that fit in both context windows; band shares above describe all requests.
Codestral's 256K window cannot take 13% of coding-agent requests, so the comparison uses only requests both can take. Claude Fable 5 is superseded: Claude Fable 5.1 costs $0.24 per request.
Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
How much capability you get per dollar
Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks
Setting it up? Claude Fable 5: model ID, providers and agent config
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute