Continue
Continue
VS
Cursor
Cursor

Continue vs Cursor: Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Continue and Cursor across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

What a day with Continue or Cursor costs

Either way, you pay for the model calls. A median coding-agent day on our gateway is 95 requests and 8.6 million tokens. The table prices every step at one model’s rate.

Both run on Standard Compute, where each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it: routine steps go to efficient open models, hard ones to frontier models such as Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra.

Providers
Vetted for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails
Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them
Median and 90th percentile active days of coding-agent traffic, Sep 14 to Oct 13, priced at list. Agent Burn Index
ModelTypical dayBusy day
Claude Opus 5.5$7.34$59.10
Claude Sonnet 5.5$3.67$29.55
GPT-6 Luna$0.23$2.43
Get your API key Continue setup →Cursor setup →

Fixed monthly plans from $19. Eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute first, no card. Trial terms

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category. You can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results that don't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Continue
Cursor
Category
IDE Extension
IDE / Editor
Pricing
Free (BYO API key), no longer maintained
Free tier / $8–200/mo
Open Source
Yes
No
Best For
Developers who want full control over their AI coding assistant
Developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience
Key Features
VS Code & JetBrains support, Customizable models, Chat & autocomplete
AI-native code editor, Tab completions, Codebase-wide chat

Verdict: Continue or Cursor?

Updated 2026-10-16

Choose Continue if you are developers who want full control over their AI coding assistant. Choose Cursor if you are developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience.

In our editorial scoring, Cursor leads in 5 of six categories (output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed and ease of use), while Continue leads in 1 (value). On price, Continue runs free (byo api key), no longer maintained and is open source; Cursor runs free tier / $8–200/mo and is proprietary.

Where Continue falls short
  • No longer maintained: the team joined Cursor and the repo has been read-only since mid-2026, so no fixes for new models or editors
  • Configuration-heavy: the power comes with real setup time
Full Continue review →
Where Cursor falls short
  • Subscription cost adds up: $30/month for Premium, with Claude, GPT and Gemini billed on top at API list price since October 2026
  • Closed source: you can't inspect or self-host it
Full Cursor review →

What it costs to run Continue or Cursor

Best API for Continue →
4 options compared, with prices and limits

Best API for Cursor →
4 options compared, with prices and limits

Found your agent? Cut what it spends on models.

Standard Compute sends each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans start at $19 a month, and eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute with no card. Choose your agent below to connect.

Continue setup guide →Cursor setup guide →

See the trial and activation steps →

More on Cursor: How much does Cursor cost now? · Can I use Cursor with my own API key on a fixed monthly budget?

In-Depth Comparison

Continue Overview

Continue is an open-source (Apache 2.0) AI coding assistant for VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, plus a CLI. It offers chat, autocomplete, and inline editing with full control over which models you use, including local models, cloud APIs, and custom context providers. It is no longer developed: the Continue team joined Cursor, the GitHub repo is read-only, and the last release (2.1.0 for VS Code) shipped in June 2026. The extension still installs and works, but expect no fixes for new models or editor versions.

Cursor Overview

Cursor is a fork of VS Code redesigned from the ground up for AI-powered development. It features tab completions, natural language code editing, codebase-wide chat, and multi-file editing. Its deep editor integration makes it one of the most polished AI coding tools available.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
7.5
vs
9.0
Autonomy
6.5
vs
8.5
Reliability
6.5
vs
8.5
Speed
7.5
vs
9.0
Value
9.5
vs
6.5
Ease of Use
8.0
vs
9.5

Features

Continue
  • VS Code & JetBrains support
  • Customizable models
  • Chat & autocomplete
  • Custom context providers
  • Local model support
  • Slash commands
Cursor
  • AI-native code editor
  • Tab completions
  • Codebase-wide chat
  • Multi-file editing
  • Natural language edits
  • Custom model support

Continue and Cursor both run on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime · Continue setup → · Cursor setup →

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe1,800+ agent users

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSCursorClaude CodeVSContinueCursorVSHermesContinueVSHermesCodexVSCursorCodexVSContinueCursorVSGemini CLIContinueVSGemini CLI