Log in
Cursor
Cursor
VS
Devin
Devin

Cursor vs Devin — Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Cursor and Devin across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results — doesn't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Cursor
Devin
Category
IDE / Editor
Coding Agent
Pricing
Free tier / $20–200/mo
$20/mo entry + usage (ACUs)
Open Source
No
No
Best For
Developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience
Teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end
Key Features
AI-native code editor, Tab completions, Codebase-wide chat
Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow, Own cloud dev environment + browser, Parallel sessions

Verdict: Cursor or Devin?

Updated 2026-07-04

Choose Cursor if you are developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience. Choose Devin if you are teams that want to delegate well-scoped engineering tickets end-to-end.

In our editorial scoring, Cursor leads in 5 of six categories (output quality, reliability, speed, value and ease of use), while Devin leads in 1 (autonomy). On price, Cursor runs free tier / $20–200/mo and is proprietary; Devin runs $20/mo entry + usage (acus) and is proprietary.

Where Cursor falls short
  • Subscription cost adds up: $20–40/month, with usage-based charges on top for heavy agent use
  • Closed source — you can't inspect or self-host it
Full Cursor review →

In-Depth Comparison

Cursor Overview

Cursor is a fork of VS Code redesigned from the ground up for AI-powered development. It features tab completions, natural language code editing, codebase-wide chat, and multi-file editing. Its deep editor integration makes it one of the most polished AI coding tools available.

Devin Overview

Devin is Cognition's fully autonomous software engineer: give it a task in Slack, Linear, or the web IDE and it plans, writes code, runs tests, and opens a pull request in its own cloud sandbox — including several sessions in parallel. It shines on well-scoped, repetitive engineering work (migrations, test coverage, small features) and improved markedly through its 2.x releases, but it remains weaker on ambiguous, novel tasks, and ACU-based usage pricing means heavy use costs real money. Cognition also acquired Windsurf in 2025, folding its IDE technology into the same product family.

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
9.0
vs
8.5
Autonomy
8.5
vs
9.5
Reliability
8.5
vs
7.0
Speed
9.0
vs
7.0
Value
6.5
vs
6.0
Ease of Use
9.5
vs
8.5

Features

Cursor
  • AI-native code editor
  • Tab completions
  • Codebase-wide chat
  • Multi-file editing
  • Natural language edits
  • Custom model support
Devin
  • Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR workflow
  • Own cloud dev environment + browser
  • Parallel sessions
  • Slack / Linear / GitHub integration
  • Machine snapshots & playbooks
  • Interactive planning mode

Whichever you pick — run it on unlimited compute

Both work with any OpenAI-compatible provider. Point the base URL at Standard Compute and get unlimited frontier-model compute from $9/mo flat — no per-token billing, no 429 rate limits.

Cursor setup guide →

Power any agent with unlimited tokens

Whichever AI agent you choose, Standard Compute gives you unlimited LLM compute at one flat monthly price. No rate limits, no per-token billing.

Get My API Key
No credit card required · Free tier included

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSCursorClaude CodeVSDevinCursorVSHermesDevinVSHermesCodexVSCursorCodexVSDevinCursorVSGemini CLIDevinVSGemini CLI