Cursor
Cursor
VS
OpenCode
OpenCode

Cursor vs OpenCode: Which AI Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of Cursor and OpenCode across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.

What a day with Cursor or OpenCode costs

Either way, you pay for the model calls. A median coding-agent day on our gateway is 95 requests and 8.6 million tokens. The table prices every step at one model’s rate.

Both run on Standard Compute, where each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it: routine steps go to efficient open models, hard ones to frontier models such as Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra.

Providers
Vetted for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails
Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them
Median and 90th percentile active days of coding-agent traffic, Sep 14 to Oct 13, priced at list. Agent Burn Index
ModelTypical dayBusy day
Claude Opus 5.5$7.34$59.10
Claude Sonnet 5.5$3.67$29.55
GPT-6 Luna$0.23$2.43
Get your API key Cursor setup →OpenCode setup →

Fixed monthly plans from $19. Eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute first, no card. Trial terms

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each category. You can change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Writes correct, production-ready code and answers
Autonomy
Completes multi-step tasks end-to-end without hand-holding
Reliability
Consistent results that don't go off the rails or break
Speed
Fast responses and quick task turnaround
Value
What you get for what you pay
Ease of Use
From install to first useful result with minimal friction
Cursor
OpenCode
Category
IDE / Editor
Coding Agent
Pricing
Free tier / $8–200/mo
Free (MIT) / free Zen models / Go $10/mo
Open Source
No
Yes
Best For
Developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience
Terminal users who want a polished AI coding interface with LSP support
Key Features
AI-native code editor, Tab completions, Codebase-wide chat
Beautiful terminal TUI, Multi-provider support, LSP integration

Verdict: Cursor or OpenCode?

Updated 2026-10-16

Choose Cursor if you are developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience. Choose OpenCode if you are terminal users who want a polished AI coding interface with LSP support.

In our editorial scoring, Cursor leads in 5 of six categories (output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed and ease of use), while OpenCode leads in 1 (value). On price, Cursor runs free tier / $8–200/mo and is proprietary; OpenCode runs free (mit) / free zen models / go $10/mo and is open source.

Where Cursor falls short
  • Subscription cost adds up: $30/month for Premium, with Claude, GPT and Gemini billed on top at API list price since October 2026
  • Closed source: you can't inspect or self-host it
Full Cursor review →
Where OpenCode falls short
  • Provider and extension compatibility should be checked for your chosen workflow
  • The free Zen models rotate and some are limited-time, so a $0 setup can change under you
Full OpenCode review →

What it costs to run Cursor or OpenCode

Best API for Cursor →
4 options compared, with prices and limits

Best API for OpenCode →
7 options compared, with prices and limits

Found your agent? Cut what it spends on models.

Standard Compute sends each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans start at $19 a month, and eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute with no card. Choose your agent below to connect.

Cursor setup guide →OpenCode setup guide →

See the trial and activation steps →

More on Cursor: How much does Cursor cost now? · Can I use Cursor with my own API key on a fixed monthly budget?

More on OpenCode: OpenCode Pricing: Plans, Subscription and API Costs (2026) · OpenCode Zen vs OpenRouter: which should you use?

In-Depth Comparison

Cursor Overview

Cursor is a fork of VS Code redesigned from the ground up for AI-powered development. It features tab completions, natural language code editing, codebase-wide chat, and multi-file editing. Its deep editor integration makes it one of the most polished AI coding tools available.

OpenCode Overview

OpenCode is an open-source (MIT) AI coding agent best known for its terminal TUI, now also shipping a desktop app and IDE extensions with OpenCode 2. It connects to 75+ LLM providers through models.dev, has LSP integration for real code understanding, and runs several sessions in parallel. The tool is free; for models you bring your own key, use OpenCode's free Zen models, pay as you go on Zen, or subscribe to its Go plan ($10/month, Go Plus $40).

Score Breakdown

Output Quality
9.0
vs
8.0
Autonomy
8.5
vs
7.5
Reliability
8.5
vs
7.5
Speed
9.0
vs
8.0
Value
6.5
vs
9.0
Ease of Use
9.5
vs
8.0

Features

Cursor
  • AI-native code editor
  • Tab completions
  • Codebase-wide chat
  • Multi-file editing
  • Natural language edits
  • Custom model support
OpenCode
  • Beautiful terminal TUI
  • Multi-provider support
  • LSP integration
  • Session management
  • File editing & creation
  • Shell command execution

Cursor and OpenCode both run on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime · Cursor setup → · OpenCode setup →

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe1,800+ agent users

Related Comparisons

Claude CodeVSCursorClaude CodeVSOpenCodeCursorVSHermesHermesVSOpenCodeCodexVSCursorCodexVSOpenCodeCursorVSGemini CLIGemini CLIVSOpenCode