Cursor vs OpenCode — Which AI Agent Is Better?
An in-depth comparison of Cursor and OpenCode across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.
An in-depth comparison of Cursor and OpenCode across output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed, value, and ease of use. Vote for your favorite.
Pick a winner in each category — you can change your vote anytime.
CursorOpenCodeChoose Cursor if you are developers who want the most polished AI-integrated editor experience. Choose OpenCode if you are terminal users who want a polished AI coding interface with LSP support.
In our editorial scoring, Cursor leads in 5 of six categories (output quality, autonomy, reliability, speed and ease of use), while OpenCode leads in 1 (value). On price, Cursor runs free tier / $20–200/mo and is proprietary; OpenCode runs free (byo api key) / pro via standard compute and is open source.
Give your chosen agent more room to build, test and iterate. Standard Compute stretches your compute through automatic provider selection and smart routing. Plans start at $19/month with $20 in monthly compute. Choose your agent below to connect. Eligible new accounts can try $0.25 of compute with no card.
See the trial and activation steps →
Weighing the cost of running it? Compare API plans for OpenCode
Cursor is a fork of VS Code redesigned from the ground up for AI-powered development. It features tab completions, natural language code editing, codebase-wide chat, and multi-file editing. Its deep editor integration makes it one of the most polished AI coding tools available.
OpenCode is an open-source terminal AI coding agent with a beautiful TUI (text user interface). It supports multiple LLM providers, has LSP integration for intelligent code understanding, and offers session management for long-running tasks. Designed for developers who live in the terminal.
Cursor and OpenCode both run on Standard Compute
