Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).
Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5 if you want the everyday default for coding agents, escalating to Opus 5.5 only for the hardest tasks. Choose DeepSeek V3.2 if you want dependable open-weight output on a tight budget.
In our editorial scoring, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads in 4 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability, speed and reliability), while DeepSeek V3.2 leads in 1. On price, Claude Sonnet 5.5 runs about $4.40 per 1M tokens (blended) and is proprietary; DeepSeek V3.2 is about $0.42 and open-weight.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models are included with Standard Compute