For coding agents, GPT-6.1 Sol costs 1.3x as much as Claude Sonnet 5.5 per request ($0.067 vs $0.053 on our measured traffic), because GPT-6.1 Sol doubles input and adds half to output over 272K tokens, and Sonnet 5.5 has no such surcharge.
Run Claude Sonnet 5.5 in your agent from $19/month
See plans| Cost at list price | Sonnet 5.5 | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached | $0.026 | $0.026 |
| Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached | $0.064 | $0.063 |
| Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached | $0.14 | $0.28 |
| Average request | $0.053 | $0.067 |
| 100 requests | $5.33 | $6.74 |
| Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes | $0.74 | $0.74 |
| A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days | $77.42 | $90.04 |
Each logged request priced at the vendor's list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request.
Both list at $2/$10 with $0.10 cache reads, so under 272K tokens they cost the same per request. The whole gap comes from the 11% of requests above that line, where GPT-6.1 Sol costs $0.28 against $0.14. If your agent compacts its context or starts fresh sessions, the gap shrinks. They score close together on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (61.8% vs 58.2%).
Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models are included with Standard Compute