GLM 4.7 costs about $0.017 per average coding-agent request on our measured traffic, at list prices of $0.60 per million input and $2.20 per million output tokens. It scores 22 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (an estimate), 38th of the 48 models we track. Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai)
Run current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models in your agent
Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.
| Cost at list price | GLM 4.7 |
|---|---|
| Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached | $0.011 |
| Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached | $0.026 |
| Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached | n/a |
| Average request | $0.017 |
| 100 requests | $1.68 |
| Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes | $0.19 |
| A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days | $17.73 |
Each logged request priced at the vendor’s list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. 20% of requests were larger than GLM 4.7's 205K context window and are left out of its figures.
| Artificial Analysis | Value | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 100 | 22 (estimate) | 38 of 48 |
| Output speedmedian | 42 tokens/s | 42 of 44 |
| Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time | 49 s | 22 of 44 |
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variant: GLM-4.7 (Reasoning). Fetched October 13, 2026. Rank is among the models on this site, older versions included. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.
Its 205K-token window is smaller than 20% of our coding-agent requests, which are left out of the figures above, so long agent sessions will hit the limit.

GLM 4.7 is Z.AI's December 22, 2025 update to GLM 4.6, with modest gains at a similar price and the same 202K context. Artificial Analysis estimates 22 on its Intelligence Index, against 19 for GLM 4.6 and 45 for GLM 5.3, and lists it as superseded. Its 202K context is smaller than 19.7% of the coding-agent requests we measured.
Sources: Artificial Analysis
Existing GLM 4.x setups that want a small step up from 4.6.
The agent matters as much as the model. Which agent gets the most out of GLM 4.7? →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute