Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best model for most Cline work: it scores 61.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, about three points behind Claude Opus 5.5, at half the price ($5.33 per 100 coding-agent requests on our measured traffic). Cline can use separate models for Plan and Act mode, so a common setup is Opus 5.5 for planning and Sonnet 5.5 for the edits. On a tight budget, Claude Haiku 5.5 ($1.31) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ($0.67 at peak rates) cost a fraction as much but score well below on long agent tasks.
Sources: Cline Plan and Act docs · Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard · Scale SWE-Bench Pro V2 · Anthropic on Haiku 5.5 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash release · Cost per request methodology
Run any of these models in your agent
Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.
Best overall. 61.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and 95.8 on Scale's SWE-Bench Pro V2, with a 1M-token context and no long-prompt surcharge. A strong default for both Plan and Act.
Best for long agent runs. #1 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 64.9%. Worth it as the Plan-mode model or for long autonomous Act runs; every rate is double Sonnet 5.5's.
Best value. Anthropic reports 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens. Prompts over 100K tokens cost five times as much, so it suits short Act steps better than long sessions.
Budget pick. Open weights under the MIT license at $0.30/$1.20 per million tokens at peak hours and half off-peak. DeepSeek reports 42.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for its October 17 update, up from 31.2%, so expect more retries on hard tasks.
OpenAI pick. 58.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at the same $2/$10 list price as Sonnet 5.5. Prompts over 272K input tokens bill at $4/$15.
Open-weight pick. The top open-weight model on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 41.8%. Its $0.26 cache-read price makes cache-heavy Cline sessions cost about as much as Sonnet 5.5.
A typical request sends 99,534 input tokens, 87% of them read from cache, and a median session runs 16 requests. Measured on pooled coding-agent requests through our gateway (79,301 requests from 75 users; Cline alone has fewer than 50 users, so its traffic is pooled), Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026, priced at each vendor's list rates.
| Model | 100 requests | Median session | Month of regular use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $5.33 | $0.74 | $77.42 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $10.66 | $1.47 | $155 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | $1.31 | $0.096 | $17.73 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.67 | $0.091 | $9.13 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | $6.74 | $0.74 | $90.04 |
| GLM 5.3 | $5.72 | $0.71 | $92.16 |
Month of regular use = the median user active on 5 or more days (1,478 requests in 30 days). Methodology · All models ranked by cost per request
The highest-rated model whose list-price cost for a month of regular use (1,478 requests) stays under each budget. Heavier months cost proportionally more.
| Monthly budget | Best model that fits | Est. month |
|---|---|---|
| Under $19 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $17.73 |
| Under $49 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $17.73 |
| Under $99 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $77.42 |
"Highest-rated" uses our editorial quality and agentic scores; candidates are current models with a checked vendor price.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Every model on this page runs on Standard Compute