Model Comparison 2026

GLM 4.7 vs GPT-5.4

GLM 4.7
Z.AI · Balanced · Open weights
$0.81/1M · 203K ctx
GPT-5.4
OpenAI · Balanced · Proprietary
$6.25/1M · 1.1M ctx

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each dimension — change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Agentic Ability
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Speed
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
Value for $
How much capability you get per dollar
Reliability
Consistent results — fewer refusals, loops, and format breaks

Specs & Pricing, Side by Side

Spec
GLM 4.7
GPT-5.4
Maker
Z.AI
OpenAI
Blended price / 1M
$0.81
$6.25
Input / output
$0.40 in · $1.75 out / 1M tokens
$2.50 in · $15 out / 1M tokens
Context window
203K
1.1M
Open weights
Yes
No
Tool use
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes
Output Quality
8.0
9.2
Agentic Ability
8.2
9.1
Speed
8.0
7.6
Value for $
8.9
8.1
Reliability
8.6
8.6

Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).

Verdict: GLM 4.7 or GPT-5.4?

Updated 2026-06-22

Choose GLM 4.7 if you want gLM users wanting a small step up from 4.6. Choose GPT-5.4 if you want the OpenAI daily driver — strong and well-priced.

Editorially it's close: each model leads in 2 of our five dimensions. On price, GLM 4.7 runs about $0.81 per 1M tokens (blended) and is open-weight; GPT-5.4 is about $6.25 and proprietary.

Where GLM 4.7 falls short
  • Incremental over 4.6
  • 202K context
Full GLM 4.7 breakdown →
Where GPT-5.4 falls short
  • A notch below 5.5 on the hardest tasks
  • Still pricier than open models
Full GPT-5.4 breakdown →

The model is half the story — the agent is the other half

The model picks the moves; the agent runs the loop, the tools, and the guardrails. Once you've chosen a model, see which agent gets the most out of it.

Compare AI agents →

Related comparisons

Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.4Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 4.7Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.4GPT-5.3-Codex vs GPT-5.4GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M3GPT-5.4 vs Qwen3.7 PlusDevstral 2 vs GPT-5.4