Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the best primary model for OpenClaw: it scores 61.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, close to Claude Opus 5.5's 64.9%, at half the price ($5.33 per 100 coding-agent requests on our measured traffic). OpenClaw's docs advise setting the primary to the strongest latest-generation model you can use and avoiding older or weaker tiers for tool-enabled agents and untrusted inputs, which matters for an agent that reads your messages and the web. The fallback list then handles cost and outages: a model from a second provider, such as GPT-6.1 Sol, keeps the agent running when one provider fails.
Sources: OpenClaw model docs · Terminal-Bench 4.0 leaderboard · Anthropic on Haiku 5.5 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash release · Cost per request methodology
Run any of these models in your agent
Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.
Best overall. The primary to start with: 61.8% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at $2/$10 per million tokens, with a 1M-token context for long skill chains.
Best for long agent runs. #1 on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at 64.9%. Use it as the primary for long multi-step automations, or for agents that handle untrusted input.
Fallback from a second provider. 58.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at the same $2/$10 list price as Sonnet 5.5, so a provider outage doesn't drop the agent to a much weaker model.
Best value. Anthropic reports 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 at $0.10/$0.50 per million tokens. A sensible fallback for quick, low-stakes requests; prompts over 100K tokens cost five times as much.
Budget pick. Open weights at $0.30/$1.20 per million tokens at peak hours and half off-peak. DeepSeek reports 42.3% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for its October 17 update, up from 31.2%, so keep it away from tool-enabled agents that read untrusted content.
Open-weight pick. The top open-weight model on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (41.8%), for local-first setups that self-host their primary model.
A typical request sends 99,534 input tokens, 87% of them read from cache, and a median session runs 16 requests. Measured on pooled coding-agent requests through our gateway (79,301 requests from 75 users; OpenClaw alone has fewer than 50 users, so its traffic is pooled), Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026, priced at each vendor's list rates.
| Model | 100 requests | Median session | Month of regular use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $5.33 | $0.74 | $77.42 |
| Claude Opus 5.5 | $10.66 | $1.47 | $155 |
| GPT-6.1 Sol | $6.74 | $0.74 | $90.04 |
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | $1.31 | $0.096 | $17.73 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | $0.67 | $0.091 | $9.13 |
| GLM 5.3 | $5.72 | $0.71 | $92.16 |
Month of regular use = the median user active on 5 or more days (1,478 requests in 30 days). Methodology · All models ranked by cost per request
The highest-rated model whose list-price cost for a month of regular use (1,478 requests) stays under each budget. Heavier months cost proportionally more.
| Monthly budget | Best model that fits | Est. month |
|---|---|---|
| Under $19 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $17.73 |
| Under $49 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | $17.73 |
| Under $99 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $77.42 |
"Highest-rated" uses our editorial quality and agentic scores; candidates are current models with a checked vendor price.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Every model on this page runs on Standard Compute