For coding agents, Claude Fable 5.1 costs 58x as much as GPT-6 Luna per request ($0.24 vs $0.0041 on our measured traffic), because Claude Fable 5.1 lists at $10 input, $0.25 cached input and $50 output per million tokens against $0.10, $0.01 and $0.50 for GPT-6 Luna, and GPT-6 Luna charges more for prompts over 272K tokens.
Run any of these models in your agent from $19/month
See plans| Cost at list price | GPT-6 Luna | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached | $0.0015 | $0.12 |
| Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached | $0.0039 | $0.28 |
| Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached | $0.017 | $0.63 |
| Average request | $0.0041 | $0.24 |
| 100 requests | $0.41 | $23.76 |
| Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes | $0.045 | $3.26 |
| A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days | $5.83 | $332 |
Each logged request priced at the vendor’s list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request.
| Artificial Analysis | GPT-6 Luna | Fable 5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 100 | 38 | 53 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0agentic coding in a terminal | 12.6% | 52.0% |
| Output speedmedian | 136 tokens/s | 71 tokens/s |
| Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time | 101 s | 4.0 min |
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variants: GPT-6 Luna (Max), speed on OpenAI; Claude Fable 5.1 (Max, Default Fallback), speed on Anthropic. Fetched October 13, 2026. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.
Claude Fable 5.1 scores clearly higher on the benchmarks above, so it may finish hard tasks in fewer steps.
Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Every model on this page is included with Standard Compute