Model Comparison 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.8

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · Budget · Proprietary
$2.20/1M · 200K ctx
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic · Frontier · Proprietary
$11/1M · 1M ctx

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each dimension — change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Agentic Ability
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Speed
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
Value for $
How much capability you get per dollar
Reliability
Consistent results — fewer refusals, loops, and format breaks

Specs & Pricing, Side by Side

Spec
Haiku 4.5
Opus 4.8
Maker
Anthropic
Anthropic
Blended price / 1M
$2.20
$11
Input / output
$1.00 in · $5.00 out / 1M tokens
$5.00 in · $25 out / 1M tokens
Context window
200K
1M
Open weights
No
No
Tool use
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes
Output Quality
8.2
9.6
Agentic Ability
8.2
9.6
Speed
9.0
7.2
Value for $
8.3
7.5
Reliability
9.3
9.5

Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).

Verdict: Haiku 4.5 or Opus 4.8?

Updated 2026-06-22

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if you want cheap, fast subtasks and subagents inside a larger workflow. Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if you want hard, high-stakes coding and reasoning where quality matters more than cost.

In our editorial scoring, Claude Opus 4.8 leads in 3 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability and reliability), while Claude Haiku 4.5 leads in 2. On price, Claude Haiku 4.5 runs about $2.20 per 1M tokens (blended) and is proprietary; Claude Opus 4.8 is about $11 and proprietary.

Where Haiku 4.5 falls short
  • Quality well below Sonnet/Opus on hard tasks
  • 200K context, not 1M
Full Haiku 4.5 breakdown →
Where Opus 4.8 falls short
  • Among the most expensive models per token
  • Slower than lighter models on simple tasks
Full Opus 4.8 breakdown →

The model is half the story — the agent is the other half

The model picks the moves; the agent runs the loop, the tools, and the guardrails. Once you've chosen a model, see which agent gets the most out of it.

Compare AI agents →

Related comparisons

Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5Opus 4.8 vs Gemini 3.1 ProOpus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2Opus 4.8 vs Qwen3.7 MaxOpus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 ProOpus 4.8 vs Kimi K2.6Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.3Opus 4.8 vs Grok 4.20