Model Comparison 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 235B A22B

Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · Budget · Proprietary
$2.20/1M · 200K ctx
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba (Qwen) · Budget · Open weights
$0.09/1M · 262K ctx

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each dimension — change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Agentic Ability
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Speed
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
Value for $
How much capability you get per dollar
Reliability
Consistent results — fewer refusals, loops, and format breaks

Specs & Pricing, Side by Side

Spec
Haiku 4.5
Qwen3 235B
Maker
Anthropic
Alibaba (Qwen)
Blended price / 1M
$2.20
$0.09
Input / output
$1.00 in · $5.00 out / 1M tokens
$0.09 in · $0.10 out / 1M tokens
Context window
200K
262K
Open weights
No
Yes
Tool use
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
No
Output Quality
8.2
8.0
Agentic Ability
8.2
8.0
Speed
9.0
8.2
Value for $
8.3
10.0
Reliability
9.3
8.8

Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).

Verdict: Haiku 4.5 or Qwen3 235B?

Updated 2026-06-22

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if you want cheap, fast subtasks and subagents inside a larger workflow. Choose Qwen3 235B A22B if you want self-hosted or ultra-cheap open-weight agents.

In our editorial scoring, Claude Haiku 4.5 leads in 4 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability, speed and reliability), while Qwen3 235B A22B leads in 1. On price, Claude Haiku 4.5 runs about $2.20 per 1M tokens (blended) and is proprietary; Qwen3 235B A22B is about $0.09 and open-weight.

Where Haiku 4.5 falls short
  • Quality well below Sonnet/Opus on hard tasks
  • 200K context, not 1M
Full Haiku 4.5 breakdown →
Where Qwen3 235B falls short
  • Behind frontier models on quality
  • Needs real GPUs to self-host well
Full Qwen3 235B breakdown →

The model is half the story — the agent is the other half

The model picks the moves; the agent runs the loop, the tools, and the guardrails. Once you've chosen a model, see which agent gets the most out of it.

Compare AI agents →

Related comparisons

Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4 FlashHaiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.4 MiniHaiku 4.5 vs Flash LiteHaiku 4.5 vs Llama 4 MaverickHaiku 4.5 vs CodestralDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3 235BGPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3 235BFlash Lite vs Qwen3 235B