Cost per coding-agent request

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.4 Mini cheaper for coding agents?

For coding agents, Claude Opus 4.8 costs 6.6x as much as GPT-5.4 Mini per request ($0.15 vs $0.023 on our measured traffic), because Claude Opus 4.8 lists at $5 input, $0.50 cached input and $25 output per million tokens against $0.75, $0.075 and $4.50 for GPT-5.4 Mini.

List prices: Anthropic pricing, OpenAI API pricing, checked 2026-10-13. Request costs: Standard Compute gateway data, 79,301 coding-agent requests from 75 users, Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026. How we compute this

Run Claude Opus 5.5 in your agent from $19/month

See plans

Cost per coding-agent request, side by side

Cost at list price	GPT-5.4 Mini	Opus 4.8
Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached	$0.012	$0.079
Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached	$0.030	$0.20
Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached	$0.056	$0.37
Average request	$0.023	$0.15
100 requests	$2.27	$14.91
Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes	$0.30	$1.93
A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days	$34.90	$231

Each logged request priced at the vendor’s list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. Both models are priced on the requests up to 400K tokens that fit in both context windows; band shares above describe all requests.

Benchmarks, speed and latency, side by side

Artificial Analysis	GPT-5.4 Mini	Opus 4.8
Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 100	24	42
Terminal-Bench 4.0agentic coding in a terminal	2.0%	21.7%
Output speedmedian	233 tokens/s	62 tokens/s
Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time	2.1 min	66 s

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variants: GPT-5.4 mini (Xhigh), speed on OpenAI; Claude Opus 4.8 (Max), speed on Anthropic. Fetched October 13, 2026. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.

What to watch for

GPT-5.4 Mini's 400K window cannot take 3% of coding-agent requests, so the comparison uses only requests both can take. Claude Opus 4.8 is superseded: Claude Opus 5.5 costs $0.11 per request. Claude Opus 4.8 scores clearly higher on the benchmarks above, so it may finish hard tasks in fewer steps.

FAQ

Is GPT-5.4 Mini cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 for coding agents?

Yes, at list prices. 100 average coding-agent requests cost $2.27 on GPT-5.4 Mini and $14.91 on Claude Opus 4.8. A median 16-request session costs $0.30 vs $1.93. Measured on 79,301 real coding-agent requests (Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026), counting only the requests up to 400K tokens that both can take.

How much does a month of Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4 Mini cost?

For the median regular user in our data (1,478 requests in 30 days), about $231 on Claude Opus 4.8 and $34.90 on GPT-5.4 Mini at list price. Heavier users pay proportionally more.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.4 Mini: which is better for agents?

Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on output quality (8.0/10 vs 5.6/10), while GPT-5.4 Mini is the cheaper option. Claude Opus 4.8 is best for existing Opus 4.8 setups until they move to Opus 5.5; GPT-5.4 Mini is best for short, simple calls in existing GPT-5.4 setups. Live community votes on this page show what people actually prefer.

Can I switch between Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.4 Mini in the same agent?

Yes. Model-agnostic agents (Cline, Aider, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Kilo Code, OpenCode, Continue) let you swap models per task. Many people route hard tasks to the stronger model and routine work to the cheaper one.