Standard Compute
Model Comparison 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM 4.6

DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek · Budget · Open weights
$0.18/1M · 1.0M ctx
GLM 4.6
Z.AI · Balanced · Open weights
$0.95/1M · 205K ctx

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each dimension — change your vote anytime. 1 votes cast so far.

Output Quality
Correctness and depth of what it produces
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0%100% GLM 4.6
Agentic Ability
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Speed
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
Value for $
How much capability you get per dollar
Reliability
Consistent results — fewer refusals, loops, and format breaks

Specs & Pricing, Side by Side

Spec
DeepSeek V4 Flash
GLM 4.6
Maker
DeepSeek
Z.AI
Blended price / 1M
$0.18
$0.95
Input / output
$0.14 in · $0.28 out / 1M tokens
$0.50 in · $2.00 out / 1M tokens
Context window
1.0M
205K
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Tool use
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes
Output Quality
8.2
7.8
Agentic Ability
8.1
7.9
Speed
9.0
8.0
Value for $
10.0
8.8
Reliability
8.9
8.4

Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).

Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash or GLM 4.6?

Updated 2026-08-02

Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash if you want cheap, high-volume open-weight agent steps. Choose GLM 4.6 if you want the value pick for open-weight coding agents.

In our editorial scoring, DeepSeek V4 Flash leads in 5 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability, speed, value for $ and reliability), while GLM 4.6 leads in 0. On price, DeepSeek V4 Flash runs about $0.18 per 1M tokens (blended) and is open-weight; GLM 4.6 is about $0.95 and open-weight.

Across 1 community votes on this matchup, GLM 4.6 currently leads in 1 of five dimensions. Cast your own vote above to move the needle.

Where DeepSeek V4 Flash falls short
  • Not for the hardest tasks
  • Quality below V4 Pro
Full DeepSeek V4 Flash breakdown →
Where GLM 4.6 falls short
  • Smaller context than the 5.x line
  • Below frontier on the hardest tasks
Full GLM 4.6 breakdown →

The model is half the story — the agent is the other half

The model picks the moves; the agent runs the loop, the tools, and the guardrails. Once you've chosen a model, see which agent gets the most out of it.

Compare AI agents →

Every model on this page is included with Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5 · GPT-5.6 Sol

Your agents never stop.
Your bill never grows.

Frontier models when it counts. Efficient models when it doesn’t. No usage limits. One flat bill.

Free trial · no card · plans from $39/mo

Free trial No credit card needed Billing by Stripe4,700+ agent users

Related comparisons

Sonnet 4.6 vs GLM 4.6GLM 4.6 vs TerraGLM 4.6 vs GPT-5.4Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GLM 4.6GLM 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-CodexGLM 4.6 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeGLM 4.6 vs MiniMax M3GLM 4.6 vs Qwen3.7 Plus