Standard Compute
Cost per coding-agent request

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or GLM 4.7 cheaper for coding agents?

For coding agents, GLM 4.7 costs 3.6x as much as DeepSeek V4 Flash per request ($0.017 vs $0.0046 on our measured traffic), because GLM 4.7 lists at $0.60 input, $0.11 cached input and $2.20 output per million tokens against $0.30, $0.006 and $1.20 for DeepSeek V4 Flash.

List prices: DeepSeek API pricing, Z.AI pricing, checked 2026-10-13. Request costs: Standard Compute gateway data, 79,301 coding-agent requests from 75 users, Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026. How we compute this

Run DeepSeek V4 Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in your agent

Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.

See plans

Cost per coding-agent request, side by side

Cost at list priceDeepSeek V4 FlashGLM 4.7
Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached$0.0033$0.011
Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached$0.0068$0.026
Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cachedn/an/a
Average request$0.0046$0.017
100 requests$0.46$1.68
Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes$0.057$0.19
A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days$5.47$17.73

Each logged request priced at the vendor’s list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. Both models are priced on the requests up to 205K tokens that fit in both context windows; band shares above describe all requests.

Benchmarks, speed and latency, side by side

Artificial AnalysisDeepSeek V4 FlashGLM 4.7
Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 1003922 (estimate)
Terminal-Bench 4.0agentic coding in a terminal26.8%n/a
Output speedmedian195 tokens/s42 tokens/s
Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time11 s49 s

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variants: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max), speed on DeepSeek; GLM-4.7 (Reasoning). Fetched October 13, 2026. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.

What to watch for

GLM 4.7's 205K window cannot take 20% of coding-agent requests, so the comparison uses only requests both can take. 87% of agent input is read from cache, and GLM 4.7 charges $0.11 per million for it against $0.006. DeepSeek V4 Flash is superseded: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.0067 per request.

FAQ

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash cheaper than GLM 4.7 for coding agents?
Yes, at list prices. 100 average coding-agent requests cost $0.46 on DeepSeek V4 Flash and $1.68 on GLM 4.7. A median 16-request session costs $0.057 vs $0.19. Measured on 79,301 real coding-agent requests (Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026), counting only the requests up to 205K tokens that both can take.
How much does a month of GLM 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash cost?
For the median regular user in our data (1,478 requests in 30 days), about $17.73 on GLM 4.7 and $5.47 on DeepSeek V4 Flash at list price. Heavier users pay proportionally more.
DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM 4.7: which is better for agents?
DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on output quality (7.7/10 vs 5.3/10), while DeepSeek V4 Flash is the cheaper option. DeepSeek V4 Flash is best for existing setups that still call the deepseek-v4-flash name; GLM 4.7 is best for existing GLM 4.x setups that want a small step up from 4.6. Live community votes on this page show what people actually prefer.
Can I switch between DeepSeek V4 Flash and GLM 4.7 in the same agent?
Yes. Model-agnostic agents (Cline, Aider, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Kilo Code, OpenCode) let you swap models per task. Many people route hard tasks to the stronger model and routine work to the cheaper one.

Community vote

Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.

Output Quality

Correctness and depth of what it produces

Agentic Ability

Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks

Speed

Tokens per second and time-to-first-token

Value for Money

How much capability you get per dollar

Reliability

Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks

Related comparisons

The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →

Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe4,100+ agent users