Model Comparison 2026

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM 5.2

DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek · Frontier · Open weights
$0.57/1M · 1.0M ctx
GLM 5.2
Z.AI · Frontier · Open weights
$1.61/1M · 1.0M ctx

Community Vote

Pick a winner in each dimension — change your vote anytime.

Output Quality
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Agentic Ability
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Speed
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
Value for $
How much capability you get per dollar
Reliability
Consistent results — fewer refusals, loops, and format breaks

Specs & Pricing, Side by Side

Spec
DeepSeek V4 Pro
GLM 5.2
Maker
DeepSeek
Z.AI
Blended price / 1M
$0.57
$1.61
Input / output
$0.43 in · $0.87 out / 1M tokens
$0.98 in · $3.08 out / 1M tokens
Context window
1.0M
1.0M
Open weights
Yes
Yes
Tool use
Yes
Yes
Reasoning
Yes
Yes
Output Quality
8.9
9.0
Agentic Ability
9.0
9.2
Speed
7.4
7.6
Value for $
9.4
8.8
Reliability
8.8
8.7

Pricing and capabilities synced from the OpenRouter catalogue. Scores are editorial (0–10).

Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Pro or GLM 5.2?

Updated 2026-06-22

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro if you want cost-conscious agents that still want top-tier output. Choose GLM 5.2 if you want open-weight coding agents that want a long context.

In our editorial scoring, GLM 5.2 leads in 3 of five dimensions (output quality, agentic ability and speed), while DeepSeek V4 Pro leads in 2. On price, DeepSeek V4 Pro runs about $0.57 per 1M tokens (blended) and is open-weight; GLM 5.2 is about $1.61 and open-weight.

Where DeepSeek V4 Pro falls short
  • Tool-use polish behind the top closed models
  • Hosted throughput varies by provider
Full DeepSeek V4 Pro breakdown →
Where GLM 5.2 falls short
  • Just behind the closed flagships on hard tasks
  • Hosted throughput varies
Full GLM 5.2 breakdown →

The model is half the story — the agent is the other half

The model picks the moves; the agent runs the loop, the tools, and the guardrails. Once you've chosen a model, see which agent gets the most out of it.

Compare AI agents →

Related comparisons

Opus 4.8 vs GLM 5.2Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek V4 ProGLM 5.2 vs GPT-5.5DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.5Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GLM 5.2DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 ProGLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.7 MaxGLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.6