Cost per coding-agent request

Is GLM 5.2 or Qwen3.7 Max cheaper for coding agents?

For coding agents, Qwen3.7 Max costs 1.1x as much as GLM 5.2 per request ($0.063 vs $0.057 on our measured traffic), because Qwen3.7 Max lists at $1.475 input, $0.295 cached input and $4.425 output per million tokens against $1.40, $0.26 and $4.40 for GLM 5.2.

List prices: Z.AI pricing, OpenRouter listed price, checked 2026-10-13. Request costs: Standard Compute gateway data, 79,301 coding-agent requests from 75 users, Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026. How we compute this

Run any of these models in your agent

Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.

See plans

Cost per coding-agent request, side by side

Cost at list priceGLM 5.2Qwen3.7 Max
Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached$0.026$0.029
Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached$0.070$0.076
Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached$0.16$0.17
Average request$0.057$0.063
100 requests$5.72$6.29
Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes$0.71$0.79
A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days$92.16$103

Each logged request priced at the listed rates above for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request.

Benchmarks, speed and latency, side by side

Artificial AnalysisGLM 5.2Qwen3.7 Max
Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 1003429
Terminal-Bench 4.0agentic coding in a terminal1.0%1.5%
Output speedmedian83 tokens/s197 tokens/s
Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time27 s14 s

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variants: GLM-5.2 (Max), speed on Z AI; Qwen3.7 Max, speed on Alibaba. Fetched October 13, 2026. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.

What to watch for

GLM 5.2 is superseded: GLM 5.3 costs $0.057 per request. The price is OpenRouter's listed rate on October 13, 2026, which can be a third-party host's; Alibaba's own API may charge differently. GLM 5.2 scores as well or better on the benchmarks above, so the cheaper request is not bought with much lower ability.

FAQ

Is GLM 5.2 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max for coding agents?
Yes, at the listed prices. 100 average coding-agent requests cost $5.72 on GLM 5.2 and $6.29 on Qwen3.7 Max. A median 16-request session costs $0.71 vs $0.79. Measured on 79,301 real coding-agent requests (Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026).
How much does a month of Qwen3.7 Max vs GLM 5.2 cost?
For the median regular user in our data (1,478 requests in 30 days), about $103 on Qwen3.7 Max and $92.16 on GLM 5.2 at list price. Heavier users pay proportionally more.
GLM 5.2 vs Qwen3.7 Max: which is better for agents?
GLM 5.2 scores higher on output quality (6.9/10 vs 6.3/10), while GLM 5.2 is the cheaper option. GLM 5.2 is best for existing GLM 5.2 setups until they move to GLM 5.3; Qwen3.7 Max is best for fast, long-context general work in Qwen-based stacks. Live community votes on this page show what people actually prefer.
Can I switch between GLM 5.2 and Qwen3.7 Max in the same agent?
Yes. Model-agnostic agents (Cline, Aider, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Kilo Code, OpenCode) let you swap models per task. Many people route hard tasks to the stronger model and routine work to the cheaper one.

Community vote

Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time. 1 vote cast so far.

Output Quality

Correctness and depth of what it produces

0%1 vote100%

Agentic Ability

Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks

Speed

Tokens per second and time-to-first-token

Value for Money

How much capability you get per dollar

Reliability

Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks

Related comparisons

Setting it up? GLM 5.2: model ID, providers and agent config

The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →

Every model on this page runs on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance
Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy
We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe4,100+ agent users