Cost per coding-agent request

Is Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.6 cheaper for coding agents?

For coding agents, Grok 4.3 costs 1.8x as much as Kimi K2.6 per request ($0.044 vs $0.024 on our measured traffic), because Grok 4.3 lists at $1.25 input, $0.20 cached input and $2.50 output per million tokens against $0.65, $0.15 and $3.41 for Kimi K2.6, and Grok 4.3 charges more for prompts 200K tokens or more.

List prices: xAI models and pricing, OpenRouter listed price, checked 2026-10-13. Request costs: Standard Compute gateway data, 79,301 coding-agent requests from 75 users, Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026. How we compute this

Run Grok 4.3 in your agent

Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.

See plans

Cost per coding-agent request, side by side

Cost at list price	Kimi K2.6	Grok 4.3
Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached	$0.014	$0.021
Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached	$0.037	$0.074
Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached	n/a	n/a
Average request	$0.024	$0.044
100 requests	$2.41	$4.37
Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes	$0.28	$0.42
A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days	$30.86	$60.65

Each logged request priced at the listed rates above for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. Both models are priced on the requests up to 262K tokens that fit in both context windows; band shares above describe all requests.

Benchmarks, speed and latency, side by side

Artificial Analysis	Kimi K2.6	Grok 4.3
Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 100	27	25
Terminal-Bench 4.0agentic coding in a terminal	0.5%	0.0%
Output speedmedian	43 tokens/s	113 tokens/s
Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time	105 s	25 s

Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variants: Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning), speed on Kimi; Grok 4.3 (High), speed on SpaceXAI. Fetched October 13, 2026. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.

What to watch for

Kimi K2.6's 262K window cannot take 12% of coding-agent requests, so the comparison uses only requests both can take. Grok 4.3 is superseded: Grok 4.7 costs $0.13 per request. The price is OpenRouter's listed rate on October 13, 2026, which can be a third-party host's; Moonshot AI's own API may charge differently.

FAQ

Is Kimi K2.6 cheaper than Grok 4.3 for coding agents?

Yes, at the listed prices. 100 average coding-agent requests cost $2.41 on Kimi K2.6 and $4.37 on Grok 4.3. A median 16-request session costs $0.28 vs $0.42. Measured on 79,301 real coding-agent requests (Sep 13 to Oct 12, 2026), counting only the requests up to 262K tokens that both can take.

How much does a month of Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.6 cost?

For the median regular user in our data (1,478 requests in 30 days), about $60.65 on Grok 4.3 and $30.86 on Kimi K2.6 at list price. Heavier users pay proportionally more.

Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.6: which is better for agents?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on output quality (6.0/10 vs 5.7/10), while Kimi K2.6 is the cheaper option. Grok 4.3 is best for simple, long-context calls in existing Grok setups; Kimi K2.6 is best for general writing and reasoning on an open-weight model. Live community votes on this page show what people actually prefer.

Can I switch between Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.6 in the same agent?

Yes. Model-agnostic agents (Cline, Aider, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent, Kilo Code, OpenCode) let you swap models per task. Many people route hard tasks to the stronger model and routine work to the cheaper one.

Community vote

Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.

Output Quality

Correctness and depth of what it produces

Agentic Ability

Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks

Speed

Tokens per second and time-to-first-token

Value for Money

How much capability you get per dollar

Reliability

Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks

Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute

Standard Compute

Current frontier models Claude Fable 5.1 · GPT-6 Astra

More intelligence
per dollar.

Each step goes to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed, with automatic fallback when one fails.

Compliance: Opt-in rules keep a company, team or key on European or US providers
Privacy: We don’t train on your prompts or store them

Get your API key See how it works

Fixed monthly plans from $19 · cancel anytime

7-day fair refund Free trial, no card Billing by Stripe4,100+ agent users