For coding agents, Qwen3.7 Plus costs 1.1x as much as Qwen3 235B A22B per request ($0.011 vs $0.0096 on our measured traffic), because Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.32 input, $0.064 cached input and $1.28 output per million tokens against $0.09, $0.09 and $0.55 for Qwen3 235B A22B.
Run Qwen3.7 Plus in your agent from $19/month
See plans| Cost at list price | Qwen3 235B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached | $0.0055 | $0.0064 |
| Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached | $0.015 | $0.017 |
| Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached | n/a | n/a |
| Average request | $0.0096 | $0.011 |
| 100 requests | $0.96 | $1.08 |
| Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes | $0.091 | $0.13 |
| A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days | $13.05 | $13.82 |
Each logged request priced at the listed rates above for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. Both models are priced on the requests up to 262K tokens that fit in both context windows; band shares above describe all requests.
| Artificial Analysis | Qwen3 235B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index10 evaluations, 0 to 100 | 12 (estimate) | 25 |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0agentic coding in a terminal | n/a | 1.0% |
| Output speedmedian | 48 tokens/s | 55 tokens/s |
| Time to first answer tokenincludes thinking time | 1.3 s | 39 s |
Source: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai). Measured variants: Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 Instruct; Qwen3.7 Plus, speed on Alibaba. Fetched October 13, 2026. Artificial Analysis runs Terminal-Bench 4.0 in its own setup, so its scores differ from the tbench.ai leaderboard.
Qwen3 235B A22B's 262K window cannot take 12% of coding-agent requests, so the comparison uses only requests both can take. The price is OpenRouter's listed rate on October 13, 2026, which can be a third-party host's; Alibaba's own API may charge differently. Qwen3.7 Plus scores clearly higher on the benchmarks above, so it may finish hard tasks in fewer steps.
Pick a winner in each dimension. You can change your vote any time.
Correctness and depth of what it produces
Tool calls, instruction-following, and multi-step tasks
Tokens per second and time-to-first-token
How much capability you get per dollar
Consistent results: fewer refusals, loops and format breaks
The agent matters as much as the model. Compare AI agents →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models are included with Standard Compute