Codestral costs about $0.0070 per average coding-agent request on our measured traffic, at list prices of $0.30 per million input and $0.90 per million output tokens. Mistral built it for autocomplete and quick edits, and no independent agent benchmark lists it.
Run current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models in your agent
Or let the router send each step to the cheapest model that can do it, on providers we vet for price, uptime and speed. Plans from $19 a month.
| Cost at list price | Codestral |
|---|---|
| Prompt under 100K tokens50% of requests, 87% of input cached | $0.0043 |
| Prompt of 100K to 272K39% of requests, 88% of input cached | $0.011 |
| Prompt over 272K tokens11% of requests, 86% of input cached | n/a |
| Average request | $0.0070 |
| 100 requests | $0.70 |
| Median session16 requests; a session ends after 10 idle minutes | $0.084 |
| A month of regular usemedian of 20 users active on 5+ days | $8.91 |
Each logged request priced at the vendor’s list rates for its own token counts, including cache reads and any higher rate for long prompts. Average output: 698 tokens per request. 13% of requests were larger than Codestral's 256K context window and are left out of its figures.
Its 256K window is smaller than 13% of our coding-agent requests, which are left out of the figures above, so long agent sessions will hit the limit. For agent loops, Devstral 2 and current general models are the closer fit.
Codestral (2508) is Mistral's low-latency code model with a 256K context, aimed at autocomplete and quick edits rather than agentic planning. No independent agent benchmark lists it. It costs $0.0070 per request in our measurements, but its 256K context is smaller than 12.5% of the coding-agent requests we measured.
Fast completions and lightweight code edits.
The agent matters as much as the model. Which agent gets the most out of Codestral? →
Current Claude, GPT, Gemini and open models run on Standard Compute